Irish CAO releases 2005 university offers to students
Monday, August 22, 2005
The Central Applications Office in Ireland has released the first round of offers for places on third level courses to over 60,000 Irish Leaving Certificate students (graduating secondary school students).
The offers are given out based on a highly competitive points system whereby students receive from
- 100 points for an A1 to 45 points for a D3 at higher level.
- 60 points for an A1 to 5 points for a D3 on lower level.
Points from a student’s best six subjects are added up to make his or her total points. This year 145 students achieved the maximum 600 points. Students achieveing this are generally regarded as the top students academically in the country.
Points required for courses in medicine and nursing have risen again leaving many candidates disappointed. Due to the huge popularity of medicine and the low supply of courses, points for entry into medicine are in the region of 580 points. Points for arts, engineering and commerce have fallen marginally.
While the points system is often attacked for placing too much pressure on students, it has avoided the problem of grade inflation that has occurred in the UK and USA. The Leaving Certificate exam has remained largely unchanged since its inception in 1924. It is often joked that the same questions reappear on the papers every 30 or 40 years.
Category:Music
|
This is the category for music. See also the Music Portal. Refresh this list to see the latest articles.
You can also browse through all articles in this category alphabetically. |
From Wikinews, the free news source you can write. Sister projects
|
Subcategories
Pages in category “Music”
(previous page) ()(previous page) ()
Media in category “Music”
Terms You Should Avoid When Creating Promotional Materials
Read An Opinion On:
byAlma Abell
Are you getting ready to create your next set of promotional marketing materials? If so, there are obviously some things that you will want to be sure to mention. However, when it comes to these marketing materials, some people continue to make the same mistake – again and again. In order to avoid a serious marketing mishap, you should avoid certain phrases when sending your promotional materials to the printers In Orange County.
“Despite Popular Belief…”
You need to work hard to avoid any sentence that will qualify your businesses claims regarding quality. This means that you do not need to create a preface, such as “we are the best” with a phrase such as “no matter what you may have heard.” You should not put any type of doubt in the heads of your potential clients. The promotional material that you create needs to leave them with the idea that they have never heard anything other great things about your brand or company.
“When You’re Not Satisfied…”
It is important that you avoid any type of “no” sentences. You should keep everything positive – avoid anything negative. Even when you are advertising a money back guarantee, you should attempt to use language that is more positive. An example of this would be using a sentence such as, “While you will experience complete satisfaction, we now offer a money back guarantee because you are a valued customer.”
“Our Happy Employees…”
It is essential that you avoid any type of text that is labeling your employees as being content or hard working. Even though you may have the most industrious employees that could not be happier with their jobs, your workers are not some of Santa’s elves. When you use them as a tool for your business, it is dehumanizing and your clients will be able to pick up on that.
“We are Better than the Competition”
Even though you need to identify that you are, in fact, the very best in your industry, you should not name any other specific company or their products. There is no one who will like negative gossip or if you are constantly bashing your main competition. Chances are this will just come off as annoying to your potential customers. While you can make subtle hints that your rivals are inferior, you should not single out any business, this will be seen as petty.
News briefs:April 23, 2010
| Wikinews Audio Briefs Credits |
|---|
| Produced By |
| Turtlestack |
| Recorded By |
| Turtlestack |
| Written By |
| Turtlestack |
| Listen To This Brief |
Problems? See our media guide. |
[edit]
Viktor Schreckengost dies at 101
Sunday, January 27, 2008
Viktor Schreckengost, the father of industrial design and creator of the Jazz Bowl, an iconic piece of Jazz Age art designed for Eleanor Roosevelt during his association with Cowan Pottery died yesterday. He was 101.
Schreckengost was born on June 26, 1906 in Sebring, Ohio, United States.
Schreckengost’s peers included the far more famous designers Raymond Loewy and Norman Bel Geddes.
In 2000, the Cleveland Museum of Art curated the first ever retrospective of Schreckengost’s work. Stunning in scope, the exhibition included sculpture, pottery, dinnerware, drawings, and paintings.
Time Warner/Comcast bid to snap up Adelphia cable service
April 9, 2005
A bid topping $17.7 billion was jointly proffered by Time Warner Inc. and Comcast Corporation on Thursday to buy beleaguered Adelphia Communications Corporation in an industry consolidation move. Adelphia is the fifth largest cable service provider in the United States with nearly 5 million subscribers.
The market-share grabbing bid trumps the previous Cablevision offer of $16.5 billion. The bid is under scrutiny by the presiding judge over the Adelphia’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing, and must also be approved by the company’s creditors owed in the range of $20 million.
The acquisition race to gain dominance in the cable service provider market is driven by the high cost of installation and maintenance of cable lines. Fiber optic networks deliver traditional entertainment programming over a cable wire and is becoming increasingly popular for broadband internet content. The growing trust and recognition of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) suggests phone service subscribers will eventually migrate to cable voice communication as opposed to keeping with traditional copper land lines. Telephone company operators are scrambling to keep up.
The largest percentage of the bid would be put up by Time Warner (TW), who could gain by getting subscribers from the valuable Los Angeles market currently owned by Comcast and Adelphia. TW can also simultaneously divest itself of a stake owned by Comcast in TW by making a tax-free swap using some of the newly garnered Adelphia subscribers.
While the consolidation would likely get a look by the government with an eye towards a growing monopoly in the market, it would doubtfully be blocked considering the existence of competing technologies. Competition exists in the form of still numerous television by airwaves usage, satellite providers, radio content companies, and telecom providers.
Adelphia suffered a corporate scandal in 1992 with similarities to the WorldCom fall. Members of the Rigas family, founders of the company, were alleged to have siphoned off millions of dollars and hidden $2.3 billion leading to the bankruptcy filing. John Rigas and son Timothy were convicted July of 2004 and await sentencing.
Australia/2008
Contents
- 1 January
- 2 February
- 3 March
- 4 April
- 5 May
- 6 June
- 7 July
- 8 August
- 9 September
- 10 October
- 11 November
- 12 December
[edit]
European Parliament rejects computer-implemented inventions directive
Wednesday, July 6, 2005
File:European-parliament-strasbourg.jpg
The European Parliament has rejected the directive on the patentability of computer-implemented inventions (software patent directive) sustained by lobbies of large software publicists such as the corporations Microsoft, Siemens, Nokia and Alcatel, grouped under the title of the European Information & Communications Technology Industry Association (EICTA, [1]). The directive involved the granting of software patents.
648 MEPs out of 680 rejected the text, 18 voted for and 14 abstained.
A rejection vote became the expected outcome when the European People’s Party, initially in favour of the directive, decided to reject it.
The European Greens, Socialist Group and European Liberal Democrat and Reform Party also voted for rejection of the directive for heterogeneous reason. Michel Rocard, author of a number of amendments to the original directive, said that the majority of the modifications were unlikely to be supported by the Commission and Council, with whom the Parliament would have had to enter a Conciliation procedure if it had voted for maintaining the directive in moditifed form. “Better have no text at all than a bad one”, he added.
Before the vote, Rocard pointed at the irritation of the Parliament towards the Commission: “There is collective anger throughout the Parliament because of the way the directive was handled by the Commission and the Council”.
During the debate on Tuesday, Commissioner Joaquín Almunia told MEPs: “Should you decide to reject the common position, the Commission will not submit a new proposal.”.
The rejection was welcomed by small and medium software companies, as well as by Free Software supporters. The Directive had been subject to an intense campaigning, within the Parliament, in the news media and on the Internet. The supporters of the Council position appear to have spent several ten millions, hiring prestigious PR agencies with at least 30-40 lobbyists who roamed the halls of the Parliament every day for 3 months, and many full-page advertisements in EU newspapers such as European Voice, EU Reporter etc. The opponents of software patentability (that is supporters of the position taken by the European Parliament in its 1st reading of 24 September 2003), coordinated under the roof of the Foundation for a Free Information Infrastructure (FFII), also had several lobbyists stationed in Brussels, conducted several conferences and demonstrations and published some newspaper advertisements, with a total budget of nearly 100,000 eur apart from countless unpaid working hours of a dedicated supporter base, consisting mainly of programmers and software entrepreneurs.
3 Steps To Finding The Best Bank For Private Student Loan Consolidation
Read An Opinion On:
By Larry Donaldson
Depending upon the type of student you were, your college experience was either filled with stress, studying and the excitement of reaching new learning vistas – or it was filled with beer, parties, and hanging out with lots of members of the opposite sex.
Either way, it is a fact that you – like all college students – had to come up with a way to pay for the whole experience. Whether you attended a less expensive state school as an in-state resident or whether you went to a fancy-schmancy private university, your student loans likely run into the tens or even hundreds of thousands of dollars.
The reality of having to repay all of those loans hits most grads at one of the worst-possible times: just a few months after graduation. Just when you are faced with the need to find a job, get an apartment, and generally get your post-college life on track, you get hit with your first student loan bill.
Things can even be worse if you have multiple loans, given that you are having to manage multiple payments at once.
However, for those with multiple loans, there is a bright side: you are likely to be eligible for private student loan consolidation.
Who Qualifies For Private Student Loan Consolidation?
If you have more than one student loan through a private lender (i.e., not the federal government but rather through a private bank), you are eligible to consolidate your student loans through a private consolidation lender.
You should consider consolidating if you are less than half-way through your repayment period, if you want to reduce your monthly payments, and/or if you believe your credit score has improved since your initial loans were received.
How Your Consolidation Loan Interest Rate Is Determined?
For private loans, your consolidation loan interest rate is determined by a combination of the going prime rate – or other major right like the LIBOR – and your credit score. Of course, your private lender will have some discretion as to your new interest rate, which is precisely why it pays to shop your rate around with multiple lenders.
3 Steps To Finding The Best Bank For Student Loan Consolidation
Here are 3 steps to finding the best bank for private student loan consolidation:
1. Start with a list of at least 3-5 banks: Do your research online to get together a list of at least 3 to 5 banks who specialize in private student loan consolidation. Remember, it is very unlikely that your first offer will be your best, so by researching multiple banks you will have a much better chance of potentially saving thousands of dollars in interest over the life of your loan.
2. Visit their websites: These days, there is nothing like the Internet in terms of conducting efficient, fast and comprehensive research. Start with each company’s website. If you like one or more sites and have the time, order an information packet through the mail.
3. Apply to at least 3 of them: Once you have found at least 3 lenders you like based upon your research, apply to all of them. When the offers start rolling in, be sure to wait for all of the offers before making a decision.
Follow these tips in order to find the best bank for your private loan consolidation.
About the Author: Get access to the best bank for student loan consolidation:
Best Student Loan Consolidation Banks
.
Source:
isnare.com
Permanent Link:
isnare.com/?aid=562277&ca=Finances